Peer Review Policy

Everba follows a rigorous peer-review process to maintain the academic quality, originality, and integrity of published work. All submitted manuscripts are first evaluated by the editorial team to determine their relevance to the journal’s scope, basic academic quality, originality, and compliance with submission requirements. Manuscripts that meet the initial criteria may be sent to qualified independent reviewers with appropriate subject expertise.

The review process evaluates the manuscript’s originality, methodological soundness, clarity, academic contribution, use of relevant literature, and overall quality. Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and confidential assessments and to disclose any potential conflict of interest. Authors may be asked to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewers’ comments before a final editorial decision is made.

The final decision to accept, revise, or reject a manuscript rests with the editorial team. The journal maintains confidentiality throughout the review process and does not tolerate plagiarism, manipulation of the review process, or other forms of academic misconduct. The review process is intended to ensure that published articles meet appropriate scholarly and ethical standards.